Imagine it like you are using a USB external drive only instead of using a USB bus you are using an ethernet switch. Not to disagree too strongly with Marco but XFS is perfectly fine.Īll you are doing with ISCSI is presenting the disk as a block device over the network. More and more are to find (firmware interaction, with nas os etc. In fact most of the time, the problems are coming from bad hardware. They want the top for -less :-)Īt least convinced to have a subscription -) Well playing in soho market is always fun. You have at least 2 nodes of storage with preferably 2 network path. Thanks for the tips, it just confirm the fact that if you want ZFS seriously > will only say you have corrupted data and as the data is also check summed > mirrored or raidzX is a requirement for it to fix anything otherwise it > as BTRFS but as to if its possible it depends on what setup you used > it on ISCSI would not be my choice, it will determine corruptions just > No idea how its on Linux but ZFS at least is proven. ![]() > I'm still less skilled to install a ZFS which I certainly should > as to what consistency means that kind of is determined by the crash > At least it means that your filesystem will always be consistent ![]() > advise you would give if using that one. Should I go to btrfs, I'm not familiar with, so what kind of
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |